Wednesday, July 06, 2005

Africa used to cover war crimes + Live 8 a Corporate Media Bonanza

British MP George Galloway: Africa used to cover war crimes.

Professor Michel Chossudovsky calls Geldof's sham Live 8 a Corporate Media Bonanza.


FPF - July 6th - 2005 - Critical British member of parliament George Galloway said in the British parliament* that Bush, Blair, their bellicose ilk and governments are wrongly suggesting ''they are writing off all debts'' from developing countries. Galloway claims that the whole circus around Africa and it's Live 8 is one vile deception.

Quoted by the malignantly Bush and Blair supporting BBC, Galloway confirmed that the international war criminals are using ''Aid for Africa'' to cover up their crimes against humanity in the disaster of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They had reduced poverty problems to a question of heavily conditional cancellation of some countries' debts, he said. "The government are engaged in a carefully calculated deception of public opinion to try and draw a veil over the disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan," Galloway rightfully concluded.

The same deception is described* by Michel Chossudovsky who is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). In an article published at GlobalResearch.ca* and called "Live 8: Corporate Media Bonanza" - Chossudovsky says it's all a "Disinformation Campaign and Public Relations Stunt On Behalf of the G8':

"Live 8, 'the greatest concert' ever aired live, has been presented to World public opinion as an "awareness campaign" in solidarity with Africa. Its stated objective was to put pressure on the Group of Eight leaders (G8) to increase foreign aid flows and cancel the debt of the World's poorest countries.

In the words of its promoter Bob Geldof, Live 8 has provided a "unique opportunity" to save a continent from a humanitarian disaster. The Live 8 concerts organized in the eight major industrial countries (as well as in South Africa), however, were not intended to raise money for the World's poorest countries.

IN FACT QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

Live 8 is a multimillion dollar undertaking, which will result in huge profits for its corporate sponsors including AOL Time Warner--the US-based media giant--the Ford Motor company--through its Swedish affiliate Volvo--and Nokia, the cell phone company, not to mention Britain's EMI Music Group, which has entered into a highly lucrative arrangement with the Live 8 organizers.

AOLTime Warner controls the US broadcasting rights which it has licensed to the Walt Disney Company for broadcast TV on ABC and a myriad of affiliated TV and radio stations, including Premiere Radio Networks, XM Satellite Radio and Viacom's MTV Networks (for cable TV). AOL also holds the exclusive online rights for the event on the internet.

TV air-time has been auctioned off around the world. Millions of dollars of advertising revenues are expected from the broadcasting of the event, not to mention the repeats, the video-clips, the internet broadcasting and the DVDs, which will be available commercially.

According to the producers, Live 8 will go down as "the biggest global broadcast in history". The organizers expect --through TV, radio and the internet-- to reach some 5.5 billion people, or 85 per cent of the world's population. The advertising industry places the number of potential viewers at a conservative two billion, approximately one third of the World's population.

By far this is largest media advertising operation in history, which will line the pockets of the promoters, producers, corporate sponsors, not to mention the royalties accruing to the performers and "celebrities". A small percentage of the proceeds might accrue to charitable organizations involved in developing countries but this is not the stated objective of Live 8.

The Ford Motor Company has used the event to promote its "up-market" Swedish car division Volvo, with advertising spots during the US broadcast. Volvo has also provided for artist transportation to and from the London and Philadelphia concerts as well as a VIP entertainment suite at the Philadelphia concert. (See http://www.adage.com/news, June 30, 2005).

"The event, said company spokesman Soren Johansson, "fits with the DNA of the company" and "appeals to peoples emotions." One of Volvo's TV spots features 'Volvo for Life" award-winner Rosamond Carr, "who operates an orphanage in Rwanda, and two others talking about Volvos values and their reasons for Live 8 involvement." (Ibid) - Moreover, Vonage, the US based phone company is said to have spent "'six figures' to become a primary sponsor of Premiere Radio Networkscoverage". And will also run a Live 8 schedule on MTV Networks.

THE EMI DEAL

In a multimillion-dollar agreement with the Live 8 organizers, Britain's EMI Music Group has secured the exclusive rights on the DVDs of the concerts in six of the G8 countries including the US, France, Britain, UK, Italy and Germany: "An EMI spokeswoman said that once sales had paid for the advance, Live 8 would pay a 'very generous royalty rate' to Live 8 on the rest of the sales."

IN THE WORDS, OF BOB GELDOF, "I HOPE THIS WILL BE THE BIGGEST-SELLING DVD OF ALL TIME."

Meanwhile, the event has contributed to boosting stock market values with EMI's share price triple its 2003 level.

DISTORTING THE CAUSES OF GLOBAL POVERTY

The concerts are totally devoid of political content. They concentrate on simple and misleading clichés.
They use poverty as a marketing tool and a consumer-advertising gimmick to increase the number of viewers and listeners worldwide.

Live 8 creates an aura of optimism. It conveys the impression that poverty can be vanquished with the stroke of the pen. All we need is good will. The message is that G8 leaders, together with the World Bank and the IMF, are ultimately committed to poverty alleviation.

In this regard, the concerts are part of the broader process of media disinformation. They are used as a timely public relations stunt for Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is hosting the G-8 Summit at Gleneagles, Scotland. Tony Blair is presented as stepping up his campaign to convince other G8 nations "to take action on poverty".

THE G8'S DEBT FORGIVENESS PROPOSAL

Live 8 fails to challenge or comprehend the G8 policy agenda which directly contributes to creating poverty, nor does it question the role of the World Bank, now under the helm of Paul Wolfowitz, the neo-conservative architect of the invasion of Iraq. [FPF - Wolfowitz - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/bqkzy]

In addressing the issue of debt forgiveness, Live 8 does not even acknowledge the impacts of IMF-World Bank "economic medicine" imposed on the World's poorest countries on behalf of Western creditors.

These deadly macro-economic reforms have contributed to the impoverishment of miillions of people. They oblige countries to close down their schools and hospitals, privatize their public services and sell off the most profitable sectors of their national economy to foreign capital. In return, the G8 promises to increase foreign aid and provide token debt relief. These reforms kill and the G8 is not the solution but the cause. Actor Will Smith addressed the crowds at the concert venues "to snap their fingers" as a reminder that every three seconds a child dies in Africa. What he failed to mention is that the main cause of child mortality in Africa are the deadly macroeconomic reforms.

Bob Geldof sees an increase in foreign aid completely out of context, as a "unique opportunity" to eradicating poverty, when in fact the proposed increase in aid flows by the rich G8 countries will lead to exactly the opposite results. A large percentage of the debt of these countries is owed to the World Bank, the IMF and the African Development Bank. [FPF - http://tinyurl.com/4p5yo ]



To address this issue, G8 finance ministers had indeed put forth a proposal which consisted in "foregiving" the outstanding debt owed to these three international financial institutions by the 18 highly indebted countries. The debt forgiveness figure mentioned was of the order of 40 billion dollars. Concurrently, there was a vague commitment to eventually increasing foreign aid flows to the 0.7% of GDP target. (http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm050611_dev.htm )

Where is the hitch behind this seemingly reasonable "debt forgiveness" proposal?
The IMF, the World Bank and the African Development Bank never cancel or forgive outstanding debts.

Because they do not forgive debts, the G8 has committed itself to reimbursing the multilateral creditors acting on behalf of the World's poorest countries.

Where will they get the money?

For each dollar of "debt cancellation" to the international financial institutions, the G8 will reduce the flow of foreign aid to these countries. In other words, the foreign aid earmarked to finance much-needed social programs will now go directly into the coffers of the IMF and the World Bank.

There is nothing new in this financial mechanism. It has been used time and again since the onslaught of the debt crisis.

"Social Safety Net" for the IMF and the World Bank
What we are dealing with is not a debt forgiveness program, but a "reimbursement" process which directly serves the interests of the creditors.
The deal constitutes a much-needed "social safety net" for the multilateral creditors. It ensures a cash flow towards these institutions, while maintaining the World's poorest countries in the stranglehold of the IMF and the World Bank. It also prevents these countries from declaring default on their external debt.

President Bush has made it very clear. The money paid to the World Bank on behalf of the countries, will be "taken out of existing aid budgets."

The "debt forgiveness" program, even if it is accompanied by an increase in foreign aid commitments, will result in a significant compression of real foreign aid flows to the highly indebted countries.

The proposed increases in foreign aid commitments are ficticious since the money is intended for the multilateral creditors. And the deal will only be implemented if the indebted countries promise to carry out the usual gamut of "free market" reforms, under IMF/World Bank supervision.

An added condition emanating directly from the Bush administration pertains to "governance". It requires these countries to "democratize" on the US model under Western supervision, as well as carry out "free elections" on the example of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Concluding Remarks

The concerts serve to usefully distract public attention from the US-UK led war on Iraq and the broader relationship between war and global poverty. Not a word is mentioned in the concerts on the fact that George W. Bush and Tony Blair are considered "war criminals" under international law.
Moreover, Live 8 tends to undermine all forms of meaningful and articulate dissent to the G8 policy agenda. With the exception of the South African venue, which included the appearance of Nelson Mandela, the concerts are devoid of a broader understanding and commitment.

Live 8 undermines both the anti-globalization and anti-war movements. It diverts public opinion and distracts media attention from the G8 protest movement. It also serves to undermine the articulation of more radical voices against the New World Order.

More generally, the event instills an atmosphere of ignorance among the millions who listen to the music and who have the feeling of doing something positive and constructive. But none of the core elements needed to understand the causes of global poverty are presented.

To the Live 8 corporate sponsors, including Bob Geldof, the EMI Group, AOL Time Warner, The Ford Motor Company, Nokia, MTV, the Walt Disney Company, etc: "Put your money where your mouth is."

If you are really committed to poverty alleviation, give the entire proceeds of this multimillion-dollar media operation, including the revenues generated by the corporate sponsors, TV networks, advertising firms, royalties accruing to celebrities and performers, to the people of Africa. Let them use this money as they see fit, without interference from donors and creditors.

To the people of Africa. Do not let yourself be deceived by a giant corporate media stunt where poverty is used as a logo to attract consumers and make money.

Default on your debt to the IMF and the World Bank.

[end item]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michel Chossudovsky is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), He is the author of The Globalization of Poverty and the New World, Second Edition, Global Research, 2003.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The CRG grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address must be indicated. The author's copyright note must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

FOOTNOTES/LINKS:

Michel Chossudovsky - Url.: GlobalResearch.ca - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/bmceh

George Blair quoted by Blair's infomation channel the BBC - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/9u86n

A very good video: Perkins story on the CIA 'jackals' and how the multinationals are cheating the world out of trillions - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/4p5yo

Geldof interview Time Magazine - Url.: [http://tinyurl.com/c4xj9]

George Monbiot's excellent article in the Guardian - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/dmwnz

FPF on Wolfowitz and Bloody Mary for breakfast - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/8x3be

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://tinyurl.com/3tro9
Editor : Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
FPF@Chello.nl

*'The war in Iraq is illegal' says United Nation's Secretary
General Kofi Annan - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/5pl2v

* Impeachbush.org is mobilizing a massive impeachment contingent at the huge 
September 24, 2005 anti-war March on Washington. Assemble at 12 noon at
the White House. Sign up here to learn about the plans of the impeachment
movement in the next month - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/cex28

*Help the troops come home! Url.: http://www.bringemhome.org
- We need them badly to fight our so called 'governments' - Url.:
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

-0-





British MP George Galloway: Africa used to cover war crimes.

Professor Michel Chossudovsky calls Geldof's sham Live 8 a Corporate Media Bonanza.


FPF - July 6th - 2005 - Critical British member of parliament George Galloway said in the British parliament* that Bush, Blair, their bellicose ilk and governments are wrongly suggesting ''they are writing off all debts'' from developing countries. Galloway claims that the whole circus around Africa and it's Live 8 is one vile deception.

Quoted by the malignantly Bush and Blair supporting BBC, Galloway confirmed that the international war criminals are using ''Aid for Africa'' to cover up their crimes against humanity in the disaster of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They had reduced poverty problems to a question of heavily conditional cancellation of some countries' debts, he said. "The government are engaged in a carefully calculated deception of public opinion to try and draw a veil over the disaster in Iraq and Afghanistan," Galloway rightfully concluded.

The same deception is described* by Michel Chossudovsky who is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). In an article published at GlobalResearch.ca* and called "Live 8: Corporate Media Bonanza" - Chossudovsky says it's all a "Disinformation Campaign and Public Relations Stunt On Behalf of the G8':

"Live 8, 'the greatest concert' ever aired live, has been presented to World public opinion as an "awareness campaign" in solidarity with Africa. Its stated objective was to put pressure on the Group of Eight leaders (G8) to increase foreign aid flows and cancel the debt of the World's poorest countries.

In the words of its promoter Bob Geldof, Live 8 has provided a "unique opportunity" to save a continent from a humanitarian disaster. The Live 8 concerts organized in the eight major industrial countries (as well as in South Africa), however, were not intended to raise money for the World's poorest countries.

IN FACT QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

Live 8 is a multimillion dollar undertaking, which will result in huge profits for its corporate sponsors including AOL Time Warner--the US-based media giant--the Ford Motor company--through its Swedish affiliate Volvo--and Nokia, the cell phone company, not to mention Britain's EMI Music Group, which has entered into a highly lucrative arrangement with the Live 8 organizers.

AOLTime Warner controls the US broadcasting rights which it has licensed to the Walt Disney Company for broadcast TV on ABC and a myriad of affiliated TV and radio stations, including Premiere Radio Networks, XM Satellite Radio and Viacom's MTV Networks (for cable TV). AOL also holds the exclusive online rights for the event on the internet.

TV air-time has been auctioned off around the world. Millions of dollars of advertising revenues are expected from the broadcasting of the event, not to mention the repeats, the video-clips, the internet broadcasting and the DVDs, which will be available commercially.

According to the producers, Live 8 will go down as "the biggest global broadcast in history". The organizers expect --through TV, radio and the internet-- to reach some 5.5 billion people, or 85 per cent of the world's population. The advertising industry places the number of potential viewers at a conservative two billion, approximately one third of the World's population.

By far this is largest media advertising operation in history, which will line the pockets of the promoters, producers, corporate sponsors, not to mention the royalties accruing to the performers and "celebrities". A small percentage of the proceeds might accrue to charitable organizations involved in developing countries but this is not the stated objective of Live 8.

The Ford Motor Company has used the event to promote its "up-market" Swedish car division Volvo, with advertising spots during the US broadcast. Volvo has also provided for artist transportation to and from the London and Philadelphia concerts as well as a VIP entertainment suite at the Philadelphia concert. (See http://www.adage.com/news, June 30, 2005).

"The event, said company spokesman Soren Johansson, "fits with the DNA of the company" and "appeals to peoples emotions." One of Volvo's TV spots features 'Volvo for Life" award-winner Rosamond Carr, "who operates an orphanage in Rwanda, and two others talking about Volvos values and their reasons for Live 8 involvement." (Ibid) - Moreover, Vonage, the US based phone company is said to have spent "'six figures' to become a primary sponsor of Premiere Radio Networkscoverage". And will also run a Live 8 schedule on MTV Networks.

THE EMI DEAL

In a multimillion-dollar agreement with the Live 8 organizers, Britain's EMI Music Group has secured the exclusive rights on the DVDs of the concerts in six of the G8 countries including the US, France, Britain, UK, Italy and Germany: "An EMI spokeswoman said that once sales had paid for the advance, Live 8 would pay a 'very generous royalty rate' to Live 8 on the rest of the sales."

IN THE WORDS, OF BOB GELDOF, "I HOPE THIS WILL BE THE BIGGEST-SELLING DVD OF ALL TIME."

Meanwhile, the event has contributed to boosting stock market values with EMI's share price triple its 2003 level.

DISTORTING THE CAUSES OF GLOBAL POVERTY

The concerts are totally devoid of political content. They concentrate on simple and misleading clichés.
They use poverty as a marketing tool and a consumer-advertising gimmick to increase the number of viewers and listeners worldwide.

Live 8 creates an aura of optimism. It conveys the impression that poverty can be vanquished with the stroke of the pen. All we need is good will. The message is that G8 leaders, together with the World Bank and the IMF, are ultimately committed to poverty alleviation.

In this regard, the concerts are part of the broader process of media disinformation. They are used as a timely public relations stunt for Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is hosting the G-8 Summit at Gleneagles, Scotland. Tony Blair is presented as stepping up his campaign to convince other G8 nations "to take action on poverty".

THE G8'S DEBT FORGIVENESS PROPOSAL

Live 8 fails to challenge or comprehend the G8 policy agenda which directly contributes to creating poverty, nor does it question the role of the World Bank, now under the helm of Paul Wolfowitz, the neo-conservative architect of the invasion of Iraq. [FPF - Wolfowitz - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/bqkzy]

In addressing the issue of debt forgiveness, Live 8 does not even acknowledge the impacts of IMF-World Bank "economic medicine" imposed on the World's poorest countries on behalf of Western creditors.

These deadly macro-economic reforms have contributed to the impoverishment of miillions of people. They oblige countries to close down their schools and hospitals, privatize their public services and sell off the most profitable sectors of their national economy to foreign capital. In return, the G8 promises to increase foreign aid and provide token debt relief. These reforms kill and the G8 is not the solution but the cause. Actor Will Smith addressed the crowds at the concert venues "to snap their fingers" as a reminder that every three seconds a child dies in Africa. What he failed to mention is that the main cause of child mortality in Africa are the deadly macroeconomic reforms.

Bob Geldof sees an increase in foreign aid completely out of context, as a "unique opportunity" to eradicating poverty, when in fact the proposed increase in aid flows by the rich G8 countries will lead to exactly the opposite results. A large percentage of the debt of these countries is owed to the World Bank, the IMF and the African Development Bank. [FPF - http://tinyurl.com/4p5yo ]



To address this issue, G8 finance ministers had indeed put forth a proposal which consisted in "foregiving" the outstanding debt owed to these three international financial institutions by the 18 highly indebted countries. The debt forgiveness figure mentioned was of the order of 40 billion dollars. Concurrently, there was a vague commitment to eventually increasing foreign aid flows to the 0.7% of GDP target. (http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm050611_dev.htm )

Where is the hitch behind this seemingly reasonable "debt forgiveness" proposal?
The IMF, the World Bank and the African Development Bank never cancel or forgive outstanding debts.

Because they do not forgive debts, the G8 has committed itself to reimbursing the multilateral creditors acting on behalf of the World's poorest countries.

Where will they get the money?

For each dollar of "debt cancellation" to the international financial institutions, the G8 will reduce the flow of foreign aid to these countries. In other words, the foreign aid earmarked to finance much-needed social programs will now go directly into the coffers of the IMF and the World Bank.

There is nothing new in this financial mechanism. It has been used time and again since the onslaught of the debt crisis.

"Social Safety Net" for the IMF and the World Bank
What we are dealing with is not a debt forgiveness program, but a "reimbursement" process which directly serves the interests of the creditors.
The deal constitutes a much-needed "social safety net" for the multilateral creditors. It ensures a cash flow towards these institutions, while maintaining the World's poorest countries in the stranglehold of the IMF and the World Bank. It also prevents these countries from declaring default on their external debt.

President Bush has made it very clear. The money paid to the World Bank on behalf of the countries, will be "taken out of existing aid budgets."

The "debt forgiveness" program, even if it is accompanied by an increase in foreign aid commitments, will result in a significant compression of real foreign aid flows to the highly indebted countries.

The proposed increases in foreign aid commitments are ficticious since the money is intended for the multilateral creditors. And the deal will only be implemented if the indebted countries promise to carry out the usual gamut of "free market" reforms, under IMF/World Bank supervision.

An added condition emanating directly from the Bush administration pertains to "governance". It requires these countries to "democratize" on the US model under Western supervision, as well as carry out "free elections" on the example of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Concluding Remarks

The concerts serve to usefully distract public attention from the US-UK led war on Iraq and the broader relationship between war and global poverty. Not a word is mentioned in the concerts on the fact that George W. Bush and Tony Blair are considered "war criminals" under international law.
Moreover, Live 8 tends to undermine all forms of meaningful and articulate dissent to the G8 policy agenda. With the exception of the South African venue, which included the appearance of Nelson Mandela, the concerts are devoid of a broader understanding and commitment.

Live 8 undermines both the anti-globalization and anti-war movements. It diverts public opinion and distracts media attention from the G8 protest movement. It also serves to undermine the articulation of more radical voices against the New World Order.

More generally, the event instills an atmosphere of ignorance among the millions who listen to the music and who have the feeling of doing something positive and constructive. But none of the core elements needed to understand the causes of global poverty are presented.

To the Live 8 corporate sponsors, including Bob Geldof, the EMI Group, AOL Time Warner, The Ford Motor Company, Nokia, MTV, the Walt Disney Company, etc: "Put your money where your mouth is."

If you are really committed to poverty alleviation, give the entire proceeds of this multimillion-dollar media operation, including the revenues generated by the corporate sponsors, TV networks, advertising firms, royalties accruing to celebrities and performers, to the people of Africa. Let them use this money as they see fit, without interference from donors and creditors.

To the people of Africa. Do not let yourself be deceived by a giant corporate media stunt where poverty is used as a logo to attract consumers and make money.

Default on your debt to the IMF and the World Bank.

[end item]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michel Chossudovsky is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), He is the author of The Globalization of Poverty and the New World, Second Edition, Global Research, 2003.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The CRG grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address must be indicated. The author's copyright note must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

FOOTNOTES/LINKS:

Michel Chossudovsky - Url.: GlobalResearch.ca - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/bmceh

George Blair quoted by Blair's infomation channel the BBC - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/9u86n

A very good video: Perkins story on the CIA 'jackals' and how the multinationals are cheating the world out of trillions - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/4p5yo

Geldof interview Time Magazine - Url.: [http://tinyurl.com/c4xj9]

George Monbiot's excellent article in the Guardian - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/dmwnz

FPF on Wolfowitz and Bloody Mary for breakfast - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/8x3be

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://tinyurl.com/3tro9
Editor : Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
FPF@Chello.nl

*'The war in Iraq is illegal' says United Nation's Secretary
General Kofi Annan - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/5pl2v

* Impeachbush.org is mobilizing a massive impeachment contingent at the huge 
September 24, 2005 anti-war March on Washington. Assemble at 12 noon at
the White House. Sign up here to learn about the plans of the impeachment
movement in the next month - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/cex28

*Help the troops come home! Url.: http://www.bringemhome.org
- We need them badly to fight our so called 'governments' - Url.:
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

-0-

MEDIA ALERT: THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE VANISHING WORLD TRIBUNAL ON IRAQ

„The best relationship with our viewers is no longer one of parent-child but of consenting adults trying to piece together the best picture of the world.'' (Roger Mosey, head of BBC TV news)

„A good case can be made that propaganda is a more important means of social control in open societies like the United States than in closed societies like the late Soviet Union... This system of thought control is not centrally managed... It operates mainly by individual and market choices, with the frequent collective service to the national interest arising from common interests and internalised beliefs.'' - (Edward Herman)

WORLD TRIBUNAL? WHAT WORLD TRIBUNAL?

Media Lens has detected a recent shift in media reporting. It is hard to quantify, but there is a palpable uneasiness amongst media professionals at the increasing rise of the blogosphere‚ and internet-based alternative‚ media sites.

Joe and Jo Public are increasingly aware that the news and commentary distributed by the BBC, ITN, Channel 4 news and the liberal broadsheets, are protecting major war criminals in London and Washington.

A blanket of almost total media silence covers Bush and Blair's crimes in Iraq, and their support for relentless corporate exploitation around the globe.

These war criminals continue to be presented as world-straddling father figures who could „solve'' poverty in Africa and so become the beloved figureheads of a „great generation''.

Consider that virtually the entire British media ignored the deliberations of the World Tribunal on Iraq in Istanbul from June 24-27. Modelled on Bertrand Russell's tribunal on the US invasion of Vietnam, the tribunal consisted of hearings into numerous aspects of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. A jury of conscience from ten different countries listened to the testimony of 54 advocates. This jury declared the war one of the most unjust in history:

„The Bush and Blair administrations blatantly ignored the massive opposition to the war expressed by millions of people around the world. They embarked upon one of the most unjust, immoral, and cowardly wars in history. The Anglo-American occupation of Iraq of the last 27 months has led to the destruction and devastation of the Iraqi state and society.

Law and order have broken down completely, resulting in a pervasive lack of human security; the physical infrastructure is in shambles; the health care delivery system is a mess; the education system has ceased to function; there is massive environmental and ecological devastation; and, the cultural and archeological heritage of the Iraqi people has been desecrated.'' (World Tribunal on Iraq, ŒPress Release about Jury Statement,' June 27, 2005, http://www.worldtribunal.org/main/?b=93)

The jury presented 13 findings against the US and UK governments that included:

* Planning, preparing, and waging the supreme crime of a war of aggression in contravention of the United Nations Charter and the Nuremberg Principles.

* Targeting the civilian population of Iraq and civilian infrastructure.

* Using disproportionate force and indiscriminate weapon systems.

* Failing to safeguard the lives of civilians during military activities and during the occupation period thereafter.

* Using deadly violence against peaceful protestors.

The jury also levelled charges against the security council of the United Nations for „failing to stop war crimes amongst other crimes''. It also charged „private corporations for profiting from the war'' and accused the corporate media of „disseminating deliberate falsehoods and failing to report atrocities''. (ibid.)

Veteran activist Walden Bello, reporting from Istanbul, pointed in particular to the „combination of eyewitness accounts that made clear beyond a shadow of doubt that the siege of Fallujah in November 2004 was a case of collective punishment''. (Bello, The Perfect Storm: the World Tribunal,‚ June 28, 2005; http://www.focusweb.org/main/html/Article631.html)

BELLO NOTED, TOO, THAT THE TRIBUNAL CLEARLY SHOWED THE EXTENT OF „THE WESTERN MEDIA'S PARTICIPATION IN THE MANIPULATION OF PUBLIC OPINION.

At a press conference after the tribunal, jury chairperson Arundathi Roy said: „If there is one thing that has come out clearly in the last few days, it is not that the corporate media supports the global corporate project; it IS the global corporate project.''

This is a perfect summation indicating why corporate crimes rarely surface in the corporate media. A newspaper database search on July 5 revealed that only one newspaper - the small-circulation Morning Star - had reported on the Tribunal. There was nothing in the Guardian, the Observer, the Independent, the Independent on Sunday, the Financial Times, the Times or any of the other watchdogs of democracy‚.

THERE WERE ALSO ZERO MENTIONS AT BBC NEWS ONLINE.

Although Media Lens is unable to monitor all television and radio news bulletins, we are not aware of any broadcast reports of the tribunal.

The level of professional media discipline required to fail to report such an important event is truly remarkable. But then, as we have frequently noted, this is standard practice when our‚ crimes are under scrutiny, rather than the crimes of official enemies‚.

VIOLENT AND BARBARIC US SOLDIERS

BBC news director Helen Boaden was pressed by several Media Lens readers ˆ acting of their own volition, an uncomfortable thought for some in the media - just why the BBC had ignored all the evidence of Bush and Blair‚s war crimes presented at the World Tribunal on Iraq. She replied:

„We've covered the issues discussed many times and will continue do so, though we did not cover this - not least for logistical reasons.'' (Email to Media Lens reader, June 29, 2005)

Readers may well be scratching their heads, wondering how they managed to miss all of these BBC reports covering the G8 leaders‚ culpability for war crimes. You may also be wondering why the BBC, one of the world‚s most lavishly-funded news corporations, could not manage even one short item from Istanbul on any of its flagship news programmes.

Regular readers may recall that Boaden has already declared publicly that: „you can be certain that if we had proof of [US war crimes], it would be leading every bulletin.'' (Email to Media Lens, May 19, 2005)

But despite the copious evidence presented at the World Tribunal in Istanbul, the BBC maintains a stoic refusal to report US/UK atrocities and war crimes.

However, the BBC can no longer maintain, for example, that there is no evidence of napalm use by US forces in Iraq. It is now on the official record that the US +has+ deployed an updated form of napalm ˆ and that US officials even lied about it to Britain (See: Colin Brown, 'US lied to Britain over use of napalm in Iraq war,' The Independent, June 17, 2005; Andrew Sparrow, 'Parliament misled over firebomb use,' Daily Telegraph, June 20, 2005; Richard Norton-Taylor, ''US misled UK over Iraq fire bombs,‚ The Guardian, July 1, 2005).

WE HAVE SEEN NO BBC BULLETIN LEADING WITH - OR EVEN MENTIONING - THE APPALLING ISSUE OF NAPALM USE BY „COALITION'' FORCES IN IRAQ.

Nor have we seen any mention of the urgent humanitarian crisis in the western Iraqi cities of Haditha and Al-Qa'im, an area that is home to 300,000 people, where hospitals have been attacked and damaged by US forces. Eyewitnesses, including medical personnel, claim that US soldiers violated the Geneva Convention and international law by preventing civilians from accessing healthcare. US forces also prevented food and medication reaching Haditha and Al-Qa'im and targeted the cities' two main hospitals, medical staff and ambulances. According to Dr. Salam Ismael, general secretary of the Doctors for Iraq Society:

"Eyewitnesses reported at least one patient being shot dead in his bed on a hospital ward. Doctors were prevented from assisting patients and civilians in need. A number of doctors and medical personnel were killed in the attack and others were arrested by US forces in the hospital. They were later released, along with the hospital manager who was detained for two days.

"The huge military operations in the area have caused widespread damage and an unknown number of civilians were killed and injured during the attack.

"Video footage shot by doctors shows a badly damage medical store in the Haditha hospital and damaged surgical theatres. The medical store contained medicine and equipment for all hospitals and medical centres in the west of Iraq. Staff and patients say the damage was carried out by 'by violent and barbaric US soldiers.'"

(Ismael, 'Iraqi hospitals attacked and damaged by US forces,' July 2, 2005; http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ISM20050702&articleId=624)

Reports of brutal "coalition" attacks on Iraqi hospitals, however, are deemed unsuitable for British audiences of mainstream media, including the 'impartial' BBC.

SUGGESTED ACTION

The goal of Media Lens is to promote rationality, compassion and respect for others. When writing emails to journalists, we strongly urge readers to maintain a polite, non-aggressive and non-abusive tone.

Write to Helen Boaden, director of BBC news,
Email: helenboaden.complaints@bbc.co.uk

And Roger Mosey, head of BBC television news:
Email: roger.mosey@bbc.co.uk

And Mark Byford, deputy director-general
Email: mark.byford@bbc.co.uk

Ask why the BBC is failing to cover the many reports of alleged US war crimes in Fallujah and elsewhere in Iraq. Why did the main BBC news programmes ignore the recent World Tribunal on Iraq? When has the BBC ever reported on Bush and Blair's culpability for war crimes?

Please copy your emails to the following:

Pete Clifton, BBC news online editor
Email: pete.clifton@bbc.co.uk

Mark Thompson, BBC director general
Email: mark.thompson@bbc.co.uk

Michael Grade, BBC chairman
Email: michael.grade@bbc.co.uk

Ask the following newspaper editors why they ignored the recent World Tribunal on Iraq:

Martin Newland, editor of the Daily Telegraph:
Email: Martin.Newland@telegraph.co.uk

Simon Kelner, editor-in-chief of the Independent and Independent on Sunday,:
Email: s.kelner@independent.co.uk

Guardian editor, Alan Rusbridger:
Email: alan.rusbridger@guardian.co.uk

Observer editor, Roger Alton:
Email: roger.alton@observer.co.uk

Financial Times editor, Andrew Gowers:
Email: andrew.gowers@ft.com

Please send copies of all emails to us at: editor@medialens.org

This is a free service. However, financial support is vital. Please consider giving less to the corporate media and donating more to Media Lens: http://www.medialens.org/donate.html

A printer-friendly version of this alert can be found here for approximately one week after the date at the top: http://www.medialens.org/alerts/index.php - and then, thereafter, in our archive at: http://www.medialens.org/alerts/archive.php

Fwd. in agreement by:


FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://tinyurl.com/3tro9
Editor : Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
FPF@Chello.nl

*'The war in Iraq is illegal' says United Nation's Secretary General Kofi Annan - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/5pl2v

FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

-0-