Monday, November 28, 2005

Killing Journalists? - "Don't Bomb Us"!

According to former 'BBC Chief News correspondent' Kate Adie - (fired because she was honest) - who twelve years ago also covered the last Gulf War, the Pentagon attitude is: "entirely hostile to the the free spread of information." - Of course the US kills journalists - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/bkzum

****************************************************************************

WAR ON THE MEDIA: "DON'T BOMB US"

By Danny Schechter - Editor Mediachannel.org

For some time, Mediachannel.org and other outlets have been reporting on the Bush Administration's contempt for the media and its attempts to manage and spin coverage.

Writing in this week's Nation, John Nichols and Robert McChesney catalogue the various strategies that have been deployed, charging, "with its unprecedented campaign to undermine and, where possible, eliminate independent journalism, the Bush Administration has demonstrated astonishing contempt for the Constitution and considerable fear of an informed public."

But would it actually attempt to "take-out" media institutions and kill or otherwise silence journalists? Would it bomb a TV station? How far will this government go?

We know that other governments have shown little restraint. An Indonesian and a Russian journalist were poisoned on airplanes in high profile cases. Others have been "disappeared," killed, jailed and tortured. Groups like Reporters Without Borders and the International Federation of reporters compile the cases and regularly call for justice.

WHY IS THE US MEDIA SO SILENT?

In our country, the Committee to Protect Journalists has played that role well with important documentation and action alerts. Each year, usually at a fancy hotel in New York, they also have a pricey fundraising dinner hosted by network anchors in tuxedos who give prestigious awards to gutsy journalists and freedom of the press advocates. All the big media companies buy tables and pat themselves on the back for upholding the first amendment. They make videos honoring the courage of media messengers. Unfortunately, those videos and their stories rarely get on the air on their networks. In my book The More You Watch The Less You Know, I derided the annual feel-good affair as "human rights for a night."

Why aren't these companies speaking out when other media organizations like Al Jazeera are threatened and attacked? What are they doing to demand independent inquiries into the killings of journalists and media staff? The toll in Iraq now stands at 93, and the Reuters bureau chief in Baghdad says the US military poses a bigger threat to newsgathering than the insurgents. (Reuters has bravely challenged the Pentagon to tell the truth!)

INVESTIGATE BOMB THREATS

And where is the ongoing investigation of the recently leaked information about President Bush's alleged desire to bomb Al Jazeera headquarters in Qatar? Al Jazeera offices had been attacked before in Afghanistan and Baghdad. One of their journalists has been killed and others jailed. Their staff and some media groups have protested but many media outlets are not following up or expressing outrage.

Did major media outlets tune out of the story because the White House dismissed it as "outlandish? Jeremy Schahill writes:

"Is the allegation "outlandish," as the White House claims? Or was it a deadly serious option? Until a news organization or British official defies the Official Secrets Act and publishes the five-page memo, we have no way of knowing. But what we do know is that at the time of Bush's White House meeting with Blair, the Bush Administration was in the throes of a very public, high-level temper tantrum directed against Al Jazeera. The Bush-Blair summit took place on April 16, at the peak of the first US siege of Falluja, and Al Jazeera was there to witness the assault and the fierce resistance.

"A day before Bush's meeting with Blair, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld slammed Al Jazeera in distinctly undiplomatic terms:

REPORTER: Can you definitively say that hundreds of women and children and innocent civilians have not been killed?
RUMSFELD: I can definitively say that what Al Jazeera is doing is vicious, inaccurate and inexcusable.
REPORTER: Do you have a civilian casualty count?
RUMSFELD: Of course not, we're not in the city. But you know what our forces do; they don't go around killing hundreds of civilians. That's just outrageous nonsense. It's disgraceful what that station is doing.

"What Al Jazeera was doing in Falluja is exactly what it was doing when the United States bombed its offices in Afghanistan in 2001 and when US forces killed Al Jazeera's Baghdad correspondent, Tareq Ayoub, during the April 2003 occupation of Baghdad. Al Jazeera was witnessing and reporting on events Washington did not want the world to see."

APPEAL FROM AL JAZEEERA STAFFERS

Al Jazeera staffers now have a blog called "Don't bomb Us."
http://dontbomb.blogspot.com/

One staffer Yousef Al-Shouly writes: "My mother (78 years old) used to tell me before going to work "my son take care", but yesterday she asked me "is it true that they want to bomb your TV station? Don't go to work."

He did. Here are some pictures:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23885066@N00/

Their staff staged a symbolic protest. They are aware that the Clinton Administration bombed the TV station in Belgrade and the Bush Administration did the same to the Iraq TV Headquarters in Baghdad. Al Jazeera demands that the British government disclose its secret document and confirm or deny the truth of the allegations. The Bush Administration must do the same.

In the USA, more subtle means are used to stop aggressive reporting. Bill Moyers describes the pressure that came down on his PBS show NOW in the new issue of Broadcasting & Cable. He is asked about bias, responding: "We were biased, all right-in favor of uncovering the news that powerful people wanted to keep hidden."

In the past, we know that low-powered radio stations in the US were shut down by the FCC until the agency changed its mind on the issue. We also know that our government runs TV stations to put out propaganda packaged as news. BBC has just launched an Arabic service with British government funds to compete with Al Jazeera.

TELL THE TRUTH CAMPAIGN

The time has come for the world media to denounce threats and actions by governments and media companies who squelch truth-telling. Truth is often a casualty of war and that's why we need the Mediachannel's "Tell The Truth About The War Campaign."

http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/1555

Please respond to this simple appeal posed by a journalist at Al Jazeera who with his colleagues has had to face down threats, incitement, putdowns, and indifference. Yousef Al-Shouly says powerfully:

"My colleagues and I need your support. So do Tayseer, Sami, Tareq, and Rashid's kids - we want to know the truth. Simply because we are men and women who bring you the news."

Danny Schechter is "blogger-in-chief" of Mediachannel.org. His new books "The Death of Media" and "When News Lies" explore media complicity in the Iraq War. See: http:www.newsdissector.org/store. Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org

Full story above - Url.: http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/05/11/con05452.html

Jackie Newberry - Outreach Coordinator, Mediachannel.org - jackie@mediachannel.org

MediaChannel is responding to the crisis of our times. We are adding news from diverse sources to demonstrate that the world can be covered in a better, more democratic way. Read the following blogs on the Web or subscribe to them for free: http://www.mediachannel.org/email/

o News Dissector Daily Weblog: http://www.newsdissector.org/blog/
o Media is a Plural Weblog by Rory O'Connor: http://www.roryoconnor.org
o Media Savvy - MediaChannel's daily news roundup http://mediachannel.org/blog/taxonomy/term/5/9

Join us in the "Tell the Truth About the War" Campaign. http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/1555

We welcome your comments and stories; use our contact form: http://www.mediachannel.org/about/.

Your donations will help us survive. Please consider becoming a sponsor of MediaChannel's Global Movement: http://tinyurl.com/9h8vd

FWD. BY:

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
FPF@Chello.nl

FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

-0-

If Hugo Chavez is all that bad why doesn’t USA stop importing Venezuela’s oil?

Bush would create a war elsewhere*... the next logical victim: Venezuela!

THE INTERNATIONAL FORECASTER editor Bob Chapman* writes: George and the neocons consider Venezuela and its President Hugo Chavez Frias a threat to US strategic security and in violation of the UN charter and terms between members of the OAS.

Plan Baboa, was used as an invasion plan against Venezuela and used as a military exercise in early 2001 by NATO.

As you can see US designs on Venezuela’s oil wealth goes back years. [ ]

''Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Frias may be one of George and the neocons most ardent critics, but he is supplying 12 million gallons of discounted home heating oil to Massachusetts’s consumers and organizations serving the poor.

Critics say Representative William Delahunt should not have made the arrangements with Mr. Chavez because he’s an outspoken socialist and revolutionary populist.

IF HE’S ALL THAT BAD WHY DON’T WE STOP IMPORTING VENEZUELA’S OIL? IT IS OUR FOURTH LARGEST SUPPLIER.

SUCH COMPLAINTS ARE SILLY.

Here is someone willing to help the poor.

If the Heritage Foundation disagrees they can volunteer the funds to subsidize what Mr. Chavez intends to do. Otherwise, they should shut up. We find it of interest that Heritage is a big Bush backer and they have made no comment on the fact that in Venezuela Mr. Chavez has an approval rating of 65% and that Mr. Bush has a 34% rating among Americans.

Mr. Chavez is trying to show Americans, as he has Latin America and the Caribbean that he cares about them, by selling them discounted oil.''

* Full story and more at - Url.: http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=47127

BOB CHAPMAN also warned:

Bush would create a war elsewhere ... the next logical victim: Venezuela!

http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=47122>

''Not only are George and the neocons lame ducks, they face political disintegration. They are political liabilities to members of the Republican Party and this is in the process of causing desertion.''

THE INTERNATIONAL FORECASTER - P. O. Box 510518, Punta Gorda, FL 33951, USA - Bob Chapman international_forecaster@yahoo.com

FWD. BY FPF:

RELATED >

MSNBC - POLL: Ninety-four (94) percent believes that George Bush and the neocon media misled the nation (FPF: and some poor people who did not use their brain nor spine in the rest of the world) - to go to war with Iraq - Url.: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8248969/

> "Poll: Americans Want Bush Impeached - by David Swanson - Tue Oct 11, 2005

POLL: AMERICANS FAVOR BUSH'S IMPEACHMENT IF HE LIED ABOUT IRAQ

By a margin of 50% to 44%, Americans want Congress to consider impeaching President Bush if he lied about the war in Iraq, according to a new poll commissioned by AfterDowningStreet.org, a grassroots coalition that supports a Congressional investigation of President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003." [ ] - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/c5yvd

> AFRICAN-AMERICANS GIVE BUSH TWO PERCENT APPROVAL RATING

WASHINGTON, Oct. 13 /U.S. Newswire/ -- According to the new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll President Bush's national approval rating has declined to 39 percent, the lowest level during his Presidency.

And among African-Americans, Bush has only a 2 percent (two %) approval rating, proving that African-Americans are not fooled by Republican's hollow apologies and empty rhetoric on outreach to the African-American community.

(NBC, 10/13/05 - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/b365o) - Contact: Amaya Smith of the Democratic National Committee Press Office, 202-863-8148 - Web: http://www.democrats.org

> OSCAR HECK - a columnist for the very good and independent 'VHeadline.com' news agency in Caracas, Venezuela - [http://tinyurl.com/c9kw3 ] - writes about the horrible 'Heritage Foundation' and: "CIA-inspired opposition anti-Chavez propaganda disinformation..." - Url.: http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=46188

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
FPF@Chello.nl

* Impeachment? - Help all the troops of whatever nationality to come back from abroad! We need them badly at home in many countries - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE PAID FOR BY TAXES - to fight with us against our so called 'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.: http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

-0-